What you will learn
By the end of this lesson, you can:
- State the decision in plain language.
- Record the evidence basis and limits.
- Name the accountable owner and conditions.
Why it matters for Wattlebridge Legal
Elspeth must state exactly what is stopped and what evidence would be needed to reconsider it.
What the team does
Turn the question into recorded work.
Name the decision basis
The decision links the selected assessment and records the limits of the supplied statements.
State the stopped use
Unrestricted rollout to 300 intended users remains on hold; no bounded pilot, client advice or court-filing task is approved.
Record closure conditions
The four conditions require access and protection verification, entitlement checks, lawyer checking and Elspeth’s review of closure evidence.
Result and limit
The stopped use, accountable owner and reconsideration boundary are explicit.
What is still unresolved: The decision records accountable judgement; it is not legal advice or certification.
See the record in the product
Review this work in context.
Elspeth Venn’s unrestricted-rollout hold decision
The link opens the exact read-only chapter after sign-in.
Open this chapter in Wattlebridge LegalOfficial guidance
Read the source guidance.
- Guidance for AI adoption: implementation guidance
- A solicitor’s guide to responsible use of artificial intelligence
Sources checked 11 October 2026. ZH AI Governance is designed to support these National AI Centre resources. It is not approved, certified or endorsed by the Australian Government.