What you will learn
By the end of this lesson, you can:
- Link evidence to the right use case.
- Review each file independently.
- Record what the evidence cannot establish.
Why it matters for Wattlebridge Legal
The three files support a specific narrative while retaining the limits of customer-supplied information.
What the team does
Turn the question into recorded work.
Provide the three files
The team supplies the use-case and sources note, client-access review, and draft-check and rollout-decision note.
Review each file independently
Anika records what each supplied statement supports, its limitations and the selected file version before it enters the assessment.
Distinguish the two findings
The access note identifies already-authorised but overly broad AllMatterSupport access; the draft note identifies 16 October instead of the source’s 15 October internal-update date.
Result and limit
Evidence makes the two gaps specific while preserving provenance and uncertainty.
What is still unresolved: Uploading these files does not make their statements an independent audit of a Microsoft tenant.
See the record in the product
Review this work in context.
Three reviewed matter-update evidence files and selected versions
The link opens the exact read-only chapter after sign-in.
Open this chapter in Wattlebridge LegalOfficial guidance
Read the source guidance.
- Measure and manage risks
- Test and monitor
- Microsoft Copilot data protection architecture
- Data, Privacy, and Security for Microsoft Copilot
Sources checked 11 October 2026. ZH AI Governance is designed to support these National AI Centre resources. It is not approved, certified or endorsed by the Australian Government.