Lesson 9 of 12 · 6-minute lesson

Check data and suppliers

Keep known facts, supplier claims, documents and independently reviewed evidence separate.

For: Data owners, procurement, security, privacy and supplier owners

This lesson uses National AI Centre guidance: Data quality checklist, Questions to ask AI suppliers.

The situation

The assistant depends on approved guidance and an external provider.

The problem

Incomplete sources or unverified supplier claims can undermine a well-designed human-review process.

The choice

Priya checks data quality while Maya records supplier answers and the evidence supplied for them.

What you will learn

By the end of this lesson

  • Review information quality.
  • Record supplier answers and documents.
  • Distinguish claims from reviewed evidence.

The pivotal moments

What changes—and why it matters

Moment 1

Review information quality

What the person does

Priya checks accuracy, completeness, where the information came from, who owns it and whether it is current.

What the workspace records

An important gap is recorded with an owner.

Notice

Known gaps remain visible during assessment.

Why it matters

The team does not assume source quality.

Data Quality Checklist with a material gap
An important data gap remains visible and owned.

Moment 2

Ask the supplier

What the person does

Maya records answers about data, controls, monitoring and incidents.

What the workspace records

Answers sit beside the documents the supplier provided.

Notice

A plausible answer is still a supplier claim.

Why it matters

Procurement and reviewers can see what needs checking.

Supplier review questions and answers
Supplier answers remain distinct from proof.

Moment 3

Record what the evidence shows

What the person does

Maya marks each item as claimed, supplied or independently reviewed.

What the workspace records

Evidence records state which claim they may support.

Notice

Uploading a file does not close a condition.

Why it matters

Assessment readers can distinguish facts from unresolved claims.

Supplier documents with evidence review states
Documents and independent review states remain separate.

Official guidance used in this lesson

Check the published guidance

National AI Centre

Data quality checklist

Provides the published information-quality review prompts.

Last checked 30 September 2026

The complication

The difficult part stays visible

Some supplier answers are plausible and documented but have not been independently verified.

The outcome

Confirmed facts, claims, supplied documents and evidence gaps remain visibly separate.

Check your understanding

Does a supplier document prove its claim?

Show the answer

Not automatically. The document can be supplied evidence, but a reviewer must decide what it supports and whether independent checking is needed.

Key points

Remember these three things

  • Record important information gaps.
  • Treat supplier answers as claims.
  • Review evidence before closing conditions.

What happens next

Bring confirmed workspace records into the AI use case assessment.