What you will learn
By the end of this lesson, you can:
- Follow one use case through the workspace.
- Distinguish preparation, assessment and approval.
- Return decisions and actions to the same use case.
Why it matters for Wattlebridge Legal
The legal team needs to follow how one drafting proposal leads to a hold decision and two owned remediation actions.
What the team does
Turn the question into recorded work.
Connect the proposal
Elspeth links the proposed Copilot system to the internal matter-update task, policy and preparation records.
Compare the basis
The team reads the same governance journey without files and with three supplied files, keeping assumptions separate from support.
Follow the hold
The resulting decision, access action and source-checking action remain connected to the use case and its review trigger.
Result and limit
Readers can trace the proposal through preparation, assessment, a hold and follow-up.
What is still unresolved: A fully recorded journey is a way to examine the proposal, not permission to deploy it.
See the record in the product
Review this work in context.
Internal matter-update governance journey
The link opens the exact read-only chapter after sign-in.
Open this chapter in Wattlebridge LegalOfficial guidance
Read the source guidance.
Sources checked 6 October 2026. ZH AI Governance is designed to support these National AI Centre resources. It is not approved, certified or endorsed by the Australian Government.