What you will learn
By the end of this lesson, you can:
- Define the permitted information boundary.
- Test supplier claims against evidence.
- Record unresolved questions and owners.
Why it matters for Wattlebridge Legal
The proposed licence and existing access arrangements must be checked separately from output quality.
What the team does
Turn the question into recorded work.
Review the matter boundary
Rohan examines the AllMatterSupport group, intended matter-team access and configured protection on manually labelled files.
Check the commercial basis
The supplier review separates an eligible Business Premium base from the paid Copilot entitlement, supported settings and exact assignments.
Preserve unsupported claims
The review records unverified tenant settings and avoids inferring automatic protection, residency guarantees or privilege preservation.
Result and limit
The firm separates documented product behaviour from its own configuration and purchase evidence.
What is still unresolved: A visible sensitivity label alone does not prove that other matter teams are excluded.
See the record in the product
Review this work in context.
Matter data-quality and Copilot supplier reviews
The link opens the exact read-only chapter after sign-in.
Open this chapter in Wattlebridge LegalOfficial guidance
Read the source guidance.
- Data quality checklist
- Questions to ask AI suppliers
- License options for Microsoft Copilot
- Microsoft Purview service description
- Microsoft Copilot data protection architecture
Sources checked 11 October 2026. ZH AI Governance is designed to support these National AI Centre resources. It is not approved, certified or endorsed by the Australian Government.